<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Construction on Richard&#39;s Static Blog</title>
    <link>https://www.main-vision.com/tags/construction/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Construction on Richard&#39;s Static Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.main-vision.com/tags/construction/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why Walkable Journeys Would Free Us From Cars, Bikes, Buses and More</title>
      <link>https://www.main-vision.com/posts/2026/10/why-walkable-journeys-would-free-us-from-cars-bikes-buses-and-more/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.main-vision.com/posts/2026/10/why-walkable-journeys-would-free-us-from-cars-bikes-buses-and-more/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Science et Avenir wrote an article about why we should cycle as much as the dutch. They think that we should cycle instead of taking the car for short journeys. I disagree. For me, if a distance is less than three kilometres then it can be done in half an hour or less, on foot, and even less if we run.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The thing about bicycles, is that they don&amp;rsquo;t mean that people are more sporty. Most are not cycling 25km twice per day. They&amp;rsquo;re riding their bike to the pub, or the train station or the shops, and then back, because they&amp;rsquo;re too lazy to walk, rather than because they want to do sports. That&amp;rsquo;s why they want to dress normally, and arrive with their hair perfectly coiffed, rather than ruined by a helmet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
