The Amplified Case for Car Free Cycling and Walking Routes

The Amplified Case for Car Free Cycling and Walking Routes

In the near future we may see many more self-driving cars from many different manufacturers. If this is the case then we should think about reducing the number of roads and lanes devoted to cars. As robots drive cars, rather than humans so safety distances no longer need to exist, because every car is talking with every other car, as a swarm.

Traffic Swarms

As I listened to a podcast about drones one of the people said “they write about swarms of drones but these are not swarms, for it to be a swarm each drone should talk with every drone and they should work as a single entity. Given this context I look forward to when we live in a world where cars are programmed to be part of a swarm, rather than individual units. This is because if cars drive themselves, they can be much closer, at a higher speed, whilst still being safe. It means that rather than have two or three lanes of traffic you would have just one, per direction. Imagine a motorway where cars behave as train cars, rather than driven cars.

Fewer Roads – Denser Traffic

If you look at a map of most parts of the world, whether countryside or cities, you will see that there are five or more roads exiting every village. With self driving cars you could reduce the number down to one or two. The other roads could be given over to pedestrians, cyclists, horse riders, skateboarders and rollerbladers. That’s because humans are human, and humans can be predictably irrational.

With self driving cars they just run programmed. This means that traffic can be synchronised to avoid having to stop, or feel any doubt. A machine runs as it is programmed to run, so it should not deviate from its course.

The Need for Machine and Human Separation

Although machines just run as programmed humans do not, whether cycling, walking or other. I do not like the idea of having self-driving cars driving by me with no human at the wheel. it’s bad enough when humans are at the wheel. It would be worse with machines.

Decreased Need for Parking

With a car that drives itself you do not need to have it parked a short walk from where you are. With a self-driving car it can park in a place that is optimal for when you request it to come back, but not in the way of others. At the moment, in summer, with human driven cars, when they are not in use they take up large parking spaces. They also take up pavements and cycling lanes. If cars park themselves then pedestrian lanes and cycling lanes can remain free of cars in summer.

And Finally

I started off with the idea that we should separate self-driving cars from pedestrians and cyclists but came to the conclusion that by having self-driven cars the need for roads will decrease as automated cars can drive along designated routes. Roads that were once used by cars would now be free of them, and they could be dedicated to healthier walking and cycling.

In my view it is a mistake to look at how to get city people out of their cars, because city people don’t need cars. When I lived in London I never felt the need for a car, but I deeply regret that no one encouraged me to get a bike and enjoy London that way. Imagine taking a bike rather than a night bus.

The issue is from villages to towns, and from village to village. Between villages and towns the distance is a kilometre or more, and if you walk over a kilometre on a dangerous road it is unpleasant. With self driving cars you could route traffic along two or three roads, and release the other roads to cyclists and pedestrians. Imagine having a slow up along certain routes every day. In fact you don’t need to imagine it. Via Verde, Voie Verte etc. are old train lines that are now wide spaces where cyclists, pedestrians and other users can be safe from the noise and pollution from cars.

AI, Film, and Social Media

AI, Film, and Social Media

I like to experiment with Bard and chatGPT. I like to see what their limits are, but with time and effort I like to get beyond their limits and get them to do what I want, without failing too often.


DJI and other brands have had self-editing options for years now, so the idea that software would edit the footage taken by the brand’s devices is not new. What is new is the desire people have to let AI replace their own creativity, and inspiration, to give the AI’s creative vision rather than their own.


The lazy Editor


Film and television are art forms, as should social media, but the problem with social media is that it is made by amateurs with no background in film or television. They break plenty of rules, which is what creative people are meant to do, but not because they want to go against cultural movements. They break the rules out of ignorance, out of amateurism, and out of laziness. It isn’t that social media has democratised video content, but rather than social media has destroyed film and television. Now we’re stuck with what I like to call User Generated Crap, but we’re also left with YouTube being a shadow of its former self.


In the days when it was going to be sued for unauthorised use of copyrighted material it was interesting, because it was about creative people being creative, before the social frameworks were in place for that creativity to be legal. I filmed the LakeParade more than once, and then spent hours editing my footage. I posted it to YouTube and the sound was removed due to copyright violation.


Today people are doing absolute crap on TikTok with music, and yet it’s legal, because copyright rules have changed, but when it’s too late for conventional editors to bother. If we invest hours filming, and then more hours editing, then YouTube will just mute the videos.


Algorithms and the Feed


I would love to enjoy using YouTube but I don’t. I don’t enjoy YouTube because it’s focused on the lowest common denominator, rather than topics and themes. The videos that are promoted have sensationalist headings, that are clickbait, rather than solid content. The wrong content is being promoted. The wrong things are being valued.


The result is that even without adverts YouTube has become unusable for me. “But you can block and dislike what you don’t like”. Sure, but I’m fighting against a gaggle of people with different audiovisiual values. I will lose.


If I don’t pay for Premium, I need to watch awful ads, but if I pay for Premium I have to sort through a jumble of crap before getting to something interesting. More than once I have spent an hour looking for something to watch, and found nothing.


The Film Industry


Studios Quietly Go on Hiring Spree for AI Specialist Jobs Amid Picket Line Anxiety


Even AI Filmmakers Think Hollywood’s AI Proposal Is Dangerous


Around 2002 I lived in Weymouth and going to the cinema cost 2 GBP so I would go to the cinema, once or twice a week. In the process I saw at least 90 films, but in that same process I learned of the formulas the US film industry use, and I have never enjoyed American films since. The problem with the US film industry is that it’s based on formulas, rather than humanity. It’s based on set plot lines, where names and locations are changed, but the story is the same.


As I said a few years ago, I prefer to watch television series, to films, because television series are still creative. Each television series is different from the other, so we still want to know what happens. With films I lose interest within ten to fifteen minutes. if not sooner. I love the film medium, but I hate what Hollywood produces.


More CGI Than Story


One of the weaknesses of almost new hollywood films is that they forget that they are a story telling medium. They forget that we go to the cinema to be told a story, not to see computer graphics. As I have said more than once, if I want to see computer graphics I can watch gamers play GTA V and other games on YouTube. If I watch films it’s because I want to be told a story that has depth and value.


BrotherHood – A Korean Film


One of the films that most impressed me when I was going to the cinema two or more times a week was Brotherhood because it had a real story, about real people in a real situation where we felt real emotions about the situation. Of course I mean a genuine story, rather than real. It’s a fictional film on what could have been real. It’s a powerful film, without too much CG, just good story telling.


AI and Special Effects


In one of the articles I shared I read about how they want AI to replace all extras. In the other article they show how kitsch is simplified by AI. In the scenarios described by those articles AI would be used to replace humans by AI, replace locations by AI, and replace everything else. Just one actor, acting by himself, surrounded by virtual people.


AI, Media Asset Management and Restoration


I do think that AI has a place in film, for media asset management, for film restoration and for tasks that are time consuming and boring for humans, but good for machines. I enjoy Media Asset management but I believe that as a person works through digital assets machine learning tools should pay attention and learn from humans. Rather than transcribing by hand, AI can transcribe and then humans double check the accuracy of what was transcribed, as with Project Gutenberg.


And Finally


From factories to film sets, AI has a simple goal: Making things cheaper


Although the title of the article quoted about is to make things cheaper, it isn’t. It’s about cutting corners to maximise profit. It isn’t about making films cheaper to see at the cinema. It isn’t about making films more cost effective. It’s about not paying human beings because AI is “good enough”. It’s about dehumanising the film industry and making it even more uninteresting than it is. If you replace humans with AI, then you lose that humanity, that makes humans relevant.


if you over-use CG and forget about story, then you might as well be making computer games rather than films, because, at the end, a lot of modern films are just computer games, that you watch as films.


I lost interest in Hollywood decades ago, so AI doesn’t change the unlikeliness of me watching Hollywood films. It just confirms the reasons for which I lost interest in the first place. The story being told isn’t interesting, and AI driven CG are a distraction, rather than justified.


| |

Virtual Reality Goggles and multicamera Production

I have worked with video cameras, from hi8 to MiniDV, Beta SP, SX, DVCAM, XDCAM, AVCHD and other formats. Cameras have grown and shrunk, controls have changed from manual to partially automated to fully automated. Television news and Studio camera productions have gone from three or four camera operators to needing a couple and then a single camera operator sitting in a side room with controls for all three cameras. Crane and jib moves are programmed so that the same action is performed at the start of each news program.

Virtual Reality technology and Virtual reality headsets are going down in price. Apps provide mobile phone users with 360° videos in normal vision and 3D. The technology we use to watch 360° content and immerse ourselves in the VR world could be adapted and made suitable for multi-camera production.

It would be nice for software to be written that moves the camera as we move our heads. This technology is already used by gunners flying in Apache helicopters. The point would be to adapt this technology to camera operating. I would manual controls for zoom and focus and a control  to lock off the camera once the desired shot is ready.

Imagine how much simpler controlling drone and crane cameras would be. Imagine also how much nicer it will be for conference attendees, concert goers and UN delegates if a smaller remote controlled camera could be used. Camera operators often obscure people’s view. This technology would be less intrusive. Camera operators could sit rather than stand for hours at a time, barely able to move.

VR goggles and the technology they contain should not be used just to consume a finished product but should instead be used as a creative/production tool. VR goggles and related tech could be used to simplify people’s work, to make it more intuitive. Multicamera production with VR goggles would reduce costs and make high-quality video coverage achievable even for modest budgets. The excuse for using a single webcam to Livestream an event will be gone making virtual attendance of events more enjoyable.